Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Yahoo! faces lawsuit over Chinese human rights violations

by Alex Donohue, Brand Republic 28-Aug-07, 09:20

LONDON - Yahoo! is facing legal action from human rights group The World Organization, over the digital giant's alleged involvement in the handover of personal information to the Chinese government, which was used to convict and torture internet users on censorship grounds.

The World Organization has filed a lawsuit in the US against Yahoo!, for handing over information on three internet users who spoke out against the Chinese government and were subsequently convicted of charges of breaking the country's tough freedom of speech laws.

The human rights group states it has strong evidence that two people, Wang Xiaoning, who is serving a 10-year sentence for writing articles calling for democratic reform in China, and his wife Yu Ling, have been tortured by the Chinese authorities during their time in prison.
Yahoo! admits to handing over the email and IP addresses of Xiaoning and Ling, but said it had a duty to comply with the laws of the countries in which it operates and denies any involvement in the detention of the convicted.

In a separate case, Chinese journalist Shi Tao is serving a 10-year sentence for making comments about the Tiananmen Square massacre. The World Organization said Tao's conviction came as a result of information that was handed over to the Chinese authorities.

The prosecution case, which was brought by The World Organization in San Francisco yesterday, states that Yahoo! has failed in its "ethical responsibilities" by not asking the Chinese government what it intended to use the personal details for.

The organization claims that the three convicted individuals have been tortured and subjected to other human rights abuses in China, which has the fastest growing internet market in the world.
In a statement, a Yahoo! spokeswoman said: "This is a political and diplomatic issue, not a legal one. The real issue here is the plaintiff's outrage at the behavior and laws of the Chinese government. The US court system is not the forum for addressing these political concerns."

Yahoo! states that it has knowingly handed over personal details to the Chinese authorities in the past, but said there was "little connection" between the information and the arrest, conviction and charge of the accused.

China, which has some of the toughest internet censorship laws in the world, has a ban on all foreign media and has been known to incarcerate individuals making pro-Western and anti-Chinese comments on all forms of internet communication, including blogs, emails, forums and in the online press.

China's treatment of "cyber dissidents" has led human rights campaigners such as Reporters Without Borders and Amnesty International, to question Google, Microsoft and other internet company's business practices in China.

Google, which set up a censored Chinese language search engine in 2005, came under intense criticism for seemingly advocating internet censorship by complying with the Chinese government's demands on preventing searches on a host of subjects, including Tiananmen Square, Tibet, democracy, and Falun Gong.

Morton Sklar, executive director of at The World Organization, said: "While it's clear that American corporations are obliged to follow foreign laws, they also must abide by US and international law."


On the side of this site is a quiz entitled "Mind Tickler." Click on the quiz and answer the questions. Provide you name when answering the quiz.

You can also click this link to take the quiz. Leave a comment on the comment box of this post after answering the quiz to let us know how you did. Any reaction will be greatly appreciated.


http://www.quizyourfriends.com/take-quiz.php?id=0910141508099542&a=1&

Thank You :)


Quiz Questions:

1. Which among the following Internet Code of Ethics do you think Yahoo! has violated?

a. Seeks the purity of the native language
b. Shows fidelity in fighting spam and network attacks
c. Observes the laws of one’s country
d. Considers public accessibility of Internet including children

2. What are some of the restricted subjects cited in the article that China demanded to Google to prevent from searching?

a. Western blog sites, emails and forums
b. On-line press releases
c. Human rights campaigners on-line
d. Tiananmen Square, Tibet, democracy

3. Morton Sklar said that, "While it's clear that American corporations are obliged to follow foreign laws, they also must abide by US and international law.” to which of the following Internet Code of Ethics do you think it would have a conflict with?

a. Respects honor and dignity of people. Insulting is eliminated
b. Respects the freedom of speech, informational transparency and efficiency
c. Respect copyright. Plagiary is intolerable
d. Respect moral and cultural values


4. The Chinese authorities tortured Wang Xiaoning with his wife Yu Ling during their time in prison. The reason for their arrest was:

a. They were writing articles calling for a democratic reform in China
b. They were blogging pro-western comments
c. They were searching for the words China had censored
d. They are recruiting rebels through the internet

5. Who is the other Chinese journalist serving a 10-year sentence for making comments about the Tiananmen Square massacre?

a. Cyber dissidents
b. Falun Gong
c. Shi Tao
d. Yu Ling

SCOREBOARD
Mind Tickler



1 JOHN REY L. ATIENZA 100
2 Reynald 100
3 alyssaborromeo 100
4 Joren G. Paulino 100
5 jessica davila 80
6 TOLENTINO, J. K. R. 60
7 Maria Nerizza Acero 60
8 april celis 20
9 warren_wafu 20

5 comments:

  1. i'm done...
    100%
    hehe...
    just clicking the link beside...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Human rights is really essential to a community even if it is personal or mediated. Mediated means of communication like internet should also respect the human rights and observe the full sensitivity of websites and pages in the different cultural communities in the globe. If one commits violation to human rights there should be a sufficient legal action that needs to be pass to correct such mistake..

    nice story you got guys

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good day!!!!!

    We should respect other people in able to avoid this kind of violation. Respect yourself in order other people respects you. We have our own freedom but we should not abused it because it can cause harm to others.



    JOHN REY L. ATIENZA
    BCR 3-1D
    2K7-033700-5

    ReplyDelete
  4. Respect is a recipe for a better communication....
    by respecting others, we can also gain respect from others.
    although it is our job to gather news and disseminate it to the people for information, we still have to get permission from the authority in order to have the information.

    my real grade is 60%...
    sorry if lied...
    haha...
    eto talaga grade ko...
    tsk....

    ReplyDelete